The Deliberate Agrarian Update: 31 January 2010


On this day, the last of January, 52 years ago, I was born. My mother once told me I was a forceps delivery. So, it turns out I was pulled (with an instrument of cold steel clamped on my head), kicking and screaming into this world. She referred to me as a “poor little thing” because I was left so bruised by the rough handling.

My father was then a student at Bowdoin College in Maine. He would go on to Tufts medical school in Boston and, like his father before him (also a Bowdoin graduate), distinguish himself as a doctor.

I wonder... what hopes and dreams and expectations did my parents have for the battered little me so many years ago? Did they suppose I would go on to graduate from Bowdoin too? Surely they would not have imagined that I would barely graduate from high school, go into the building trades, and eventually distinguish myself for writing a book that tells people how to make their own chicken plucking machine. Life is funny like that.

Me & My Banjo: One Year Later
Last year around this time I wrote here about the birthday present I bought myself—a very fine handcrafted banjo. I figured it was about time I finally learned to play a musical instrument, and reasoned that it couldn’t be much more difficult than learning to skillfully butcher a chicken.

Well, silly me. I was wrong.

I was hoping to be playing Shady Grove like Doc Watson by now but (and it pains me to admit this) I can’t even play Twinkle Twinkle Little Star. I am an utter failure as a banjo player.

I now realize more fully that people who play the banjo particularly well—people like the Bartlett boys up in North Dakota, or Chris Saenz in Kentucky, or Ricky Skaggs, wherever he lives—are musical geniuses.... and I am not. Clearly, these people were not delivered with forceps.

I am cognizant of Thomas Edison’s famous quip that genius is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration. Such insight—from a man who was labeled as “addled” by his grade school teacher—has been a ray of hope to me for many years. I’ve never been averse to hard work. I am persistent. And I’m sure some have thought me addled too, though they would not have used that particular term. But, I ask you, could Thomas Edison play banjo? I doubt it.

Truth be told, when spring rolled around last year, I laid my banjo aside, focusing instead on the work of my garden, and my home, and of selling chicken plucker parts to people who read my book.

However, on rare occasions, I will take my banjo out of its case, tune it up, pluck the strings for a half hour or so, and marvel—not only at the beautiful tones that come from precisely tightened lengths of wire, but at the incredible ability of some people to make intelligent and beautiful music come from such a simple instrument.

Hambone & Harmonica
Not only am I musically inept, I’m also woefully ignorant of musical things in general. For example I never realized that slapping your hands on your body in rhythm was referred to as playing the “hambone.” And this “instrument” can be downright fascinating to watch, as you will see in this YouTube clip.



So I did some more looking around and found This Classic Hambone Performance From an old episode of HeeHaw.

And it turns out that some really talented people can play hambone and sing... at the same time.
(Check it out Here)

Introducing The Whizbang Row Cover Hoop System
I have put together an internet tutorial explaining the system I developed for using row cover fabric in my garden. This has been a long time coming. I hope you can put the information to good use. Check it out at this link: www.WhizbangRowCover.com

Robert E. Lee’s Perspective on The Future

I’m an admirer of Robert E. Lee—so much so that I named one of my sons Robert E. Lee Kimball. So I was delighted to read the following quote from the great Southern general and Christian believer in Franklin Sanders’ daily e-mail report. This perspective is something for us all to keep in mind:
"In spite of failures which I lament, of errors which I now see and acknowledge, or of the present aspect of affairs, do I despair the future?  The truth is this:  the march of Providence is so slow, our desires so impatient, the work of progress is so immense, & our  means of aiding it so feeble, the life of humanity is so long, that of the individual so brief, that we often see only the ebb of the advancing wave and are thus discouraged.  It is history that teaches us to hope."

Robert E. Lee These Days

My son Robert worked the month of January outdoors every day in the woods, helping to run lines for a very large maple syrup operation. We’re talking many thousands of taps, and a tremendous volume of sap. It is industrialized maple syrup production.

On the weekends he cuts loose with his four wheeler. I can’t stand the noisy thing, but the kids have fun with it, as the picture above attests. And the machine has been a real learning experience, as Robert has rebuilt the engine a couple of times.


The Honeybee-Evolution Conundrum
As I have been reading more about honeybees and beekeeping (see my previous monthly updates), I’ve encountered an interesting evolutionary conundrum. Just about all the bee books I’ve been reading mention something about the honeybee evolving over many millions of years. This is, of course, in line with mainstream thinking that assumes evolutionary theory is rock-solid fact, supported by overwhelming scientific evidence.

But anyone who has honestly looked at the evolution perspective understands that evolutionary science is as faith-based as creation science. I’m inclined to think it takes more faith to believe in evolution than to believe in creation, and honeybees are a case in point. It takes a whole lot of creative “scientific” theory to make honeybee evolution work. Here’s what I mean (this involves a bit of introduction)...

Honeybees function and thrive only in a colony. You can not keep a single bee as a pet. It will die. It must be part of the colony, and within a colony of 50,000 or so bees, there are three distinct kinds of bees.

Worker Bees: Worker bees do virtually all the work of the colony. They gather nectar and pollen, make honey, feed and nurture the young, protect the hive, and much more. These worker bees do everything except reproduce. They can not and do not lay eggs that become the next generation of bees.

Drone Bees: Drones are the male bees. There may be a couple thousand drones in a colony. Drones do none of the work of the hive. Their only purpose they serve is to mate with the queen when this is needed.

Queen Bee: A healthy bee colony has one single queen bee. She is a female with reproductive capacity. In fact, the queen’s only purpose in life it to be bred by one or more drones in a single mating flight early in her life, then to spend the rest of her years laying eggs that will be the next generations of workers and drones. She will also lay the egg that becomes her replacement. That is all the queen bee does. And despite the title of queen, she is not in charge of the hive (science can not account for the pervasive controlling “instinct” that guides the colony).

Now, knowing all that, the conundrum arises: How can evolution possibly apply to honeybees when there is no genetic transference between the worker bees (those that do almost all the various tasks of the hive) and the next generation?

Restated: Faith-based evolution explains to its acolytes that many small, favorable, genetic changes (i.e., mutations) that occur in a species are passed to the next generation, again and again, over millions and millions of years, adding up to big changes in the organism and its ability to survive (survival of the fittest). But this just doesn’t hold water with honeybees because if there were favorable genetic mutations in the female worker bee, it is impossible for these to be passed on because the female workers do not lay eggs.

I heard this explained once when I was a teenager (a long time ago), have read nothing about it since, and could not find any information about it on the internet. Only now, as I’ve been reading about beekeeping, has it “popped up” in my thinking.

For Sale: Little Red
Back in June of 2007 I paid $600 for the little red car pictured above. It had a little over 160,000 miles on it and the fifth gear did not work. But it ran good. I put brakes on it and a new battery and it has continued to run since then without any trouble. Little Red has been an economical car in every sense of the word. But it now has a tad over 200,000 miles on the odometer and the catalytic converter needs replacing. Catalytic converters are expensive and, considering everything else, I decided to get another car.

My new unit is also a Nissan Sentra. It is a 2002 with low mileage (146,000). I paid a bit more than $600 for it but not much. The important thing was that I was able to pay cash, and that’s a good feeling.

My new car is a sedan, which means I’ll be able to cram more stuff more easily in the back seat. I use my car for getting to and from work every day and for hauling things that I used to haul with a pickup (years ago). I like my “new” car but it is way too quiet, and it’s a boring gray color.

So Little Red is for sale. She’s rusty, and rattles driving down the road, and the sunroof leaks, and the dvd player doesn’t play, and it still doesn’t have a fifth gear, and it’s really loud (but it sounds really cool). My family can hear me coming home from a mile away. Here’s a look under the hood:



Make me an offer :-)

—Sneak Preview—
Planet Whizbang Garden Tote



I decided to make a nice garden tote for Marlene. It is pictured above with some Copra onions from last year’s garden.

I actually made four other totes before I got to the design shown above. And there will be a couple more minor modifications to the design before I’m satisfied and ready to officially reveal this new product to the world.

The tote is a simple, practical homestead tool that is built to last for a good many years. These totes are attractive and useful and would make a fine gift for any countrywoman on your gift list.

I even think an enterprising person with the tools and skills could make these totes and sell them for a reasonable profit at farm markets and craft shows.

If you are halfway handy, you can just look at the picture and make your own garden tote, but my plans will provide you with and intelligent approach to easily and successfully get the project done—one that guarantees you a very nice finished product made with a minimum of trouble.

[Update: April 2014—The tote plans are now available at This Link]

—More Yeoman Furniture—
A Shaker Towel Rack
I’m still plugging away on the bathroom remodeling project that I started last October. In a previous monthly report I showed you the Yeoman cabinet I made for the room. Now I’ve made a matching towel rack, as pictured above.

This rack is modeled after a circa 1840 Shaker drying rack that is in the Fruitlands Museums in Harvard, Mass. I have not been to that museum but I bought the book, Making Authentic Shaker Furniture, by John G Shea, and the drying rack is in there.

My Shaker-inspired towel rack is made entirely of common 3/4” pine. It has a layer of red milk paint with a layer of black over it. Then it was sanded and sealed with linseed oil. I intend to give it a few coats of spar varnish. The rails are secured to the upright posts with pegged mortise and tenons. Here is a close up:



The bottom looks like a block of solid wood (as the Shakers would have used)...



...but it is really just hollow 3/4” pine and I put some lead weights inside:




Shaker Worship
As I’m sure you know, the Shakers were a religious sect. They started with Mother Ann Lee who came to America from England in 1774 with eight of her faithful followers. They were officially known as “The United Society of Believers in Christ’s Second Appearing.” But they had an unusual ritualistic dance that led the “unbelievers” around them to call them Shakers.

A few years ago my family visited Hancock Shaker village in Massachusetts. There is a room with several informative displays where you can read about the Shakers before going into the village. Most people breeze through this area because it takes some time to read the information. But I stayed and read.

I’ll never forget standing in front of an old drawing showing the Shakers doing their worship dance. As I was reading about their religious beliefs and outward expressions of worship, a family was standing behind me. The mother read the same information that I was reading, but she read it out loud to her husband and children. After she was done reading, I’ll never forget her comment: “Wow. That is sooo...(long pause while she thinks about the right word to use)...Satanic.”

Here is an excerpt from “Making Authentic Shaker Furniture.”
The incongruity of sober, orderly and industrious individuals, so completely cutting loose in the guise of worship, defies explanation. For once their Sunday ceremonies started, all inhibitions of their everyday lives seemed to escape in wild outbursts of song and dance with overtones of the mystical fanaticism which was part of their religious worship.

While, later on, the Shaker dances and rituals were rehearsed and became more formalized, the fanatical nature of their worship was laced with hallucinogenic apparitions and a sort of spiritualism which seemed to induce mass hysteria. They joined in emotional outbursts of prayer for salvation and violent denunciations of the devil who lurked in the “outside world.” They exhibited their “gifts” of song and movement as well as the “gift of tongues” which enabled them to sing in unknown languages and conduct mumbled conversations with St. Peter, John the Baptist, Mother Ann, and even General George Washington.
That sounds like a blend of hyper-Pentecostalism and Spiritualism. I have read elsewhere that Spiritualism (which was in vogue during the mid 1800s, as I mentioned in last month’s blog essay) was, indeed, integrated into the Shaker belief system. They tended to adopt different ideas, and their theology underwent changes over the years. But they sure did make some nice furniture.

Some Investment Advice
An investment is something you put money, time, or other capital into with the intention and expectation that a benefit of greater value will eventually be realized. Most people, when they think of investment advice, think only of money and ways of making their money make more money. I’m not qualified to give you that kind of advice because I’m not a successful investor in that way. But I would like to offer one bit of investment advice that I have been successful at. Here it is.....

Grow a garden. Many of you reading this already have gardens and I don’t have to tell you about this. But you may consider what follows as a midwinter pep talk (perhaps you’ll want to grow a bigger garden). In any event, here are the benefits that investing in some seeds and plants and tools, and focusing on growing your own food will bring:

Food— A few seeds, planted in the ground and carefully husbanded, will yield a LOT of food. This is God’s economy in action. Since it would otherwise cost you money to buy food, you are, in a sense, growing money when you grow a garden. And this is an economic benefit that you can enjoy in the midst of economic inflation, deflation, prosperity, or a total crash.

Good Food— When you grow your own food, it is fresher and more wholesome than what you can buy in a store. And it’s not mystery food from who-knows-where. It’s food you can trust to be good in a world full of food you can not trust.

Security— People who grow their own food (even just some of their own food) have a measure of personal security that those who do not garden will never have. Don’t be one of the helpless masses of non-gardeners.

Exercise— People with sedentary modern jobs spend a lot of money on exercise club memberships trying to make up for their lack of physical activity and keep their bodies in shape. Gardening provides you with an excellent opportunity for free outdoor exercise: digging, hoeing, hilling and so on. For a little exercise, grow a little garden. For a lot of exercise, grow a lot of garden.

Sunshine— Most moderns don’t get enough sunshine and that’s unhealthy. Then there are the legions of people who spend money getting an artificial tanning-booth tan. Save the money. Garden. Get a real tan.

Satisfaction— Modern men, women, and children are conditioned by the media (in collusion with the industrial providers) to be dissatisfied unless they can buy the newest so-called convenience or nifty gadget, which is soon broken or outdated or familiar and less satisfying. So we pursue the acquisition of so much material stuff, again and again, even though we know the satisfaction from these things is fleeting.

Genuine satisfaction rarely comes from buying something. True satisfaction comes when we pursue an objective that is constructive, productive, and creative, using our minds and our hands. This kind of satisfaction comes when you plant a seed, nurture it into food, harvest it, and eat it. Your body and, in a sense, your soul are both nourished by homegrown food.

Wonder, Beauty, Excitement— A simple garden has more wonder and beauty in it than any movie or video game or museum or cheap thrill that is offered by the industrialized culture. Agri-culture is your ticket to partake in the awesomeness of God’s creation.

My One Gardening Book Recommendation

Over the years I have bought all kinds of gardening books. I have gardening books by Eliot Coleman, John Jeavons, Mel Bartholomew, Leandre Poisson, Dick Raymond, Reader’s Digest, and others. All of them are good in their own way. But last year I bought a copy of Steve Solomon’s, Gardening When It Counts: Growing Food in Hard Times.

Steve Solomon, founder of the Territorial Seeds company, has an approach to gardening (based on decades of experience) that is down to earth, which means it is simple, practical, and intelligent. Last year around this time I mentioned "Gardening When it Counts" and posted several excerpts from the book. You can read them at this link: Gardening Bits For Hard Times

In my gardening bits essay, I mention Steve Solomon’s Complete Organic Fertilizer (COF) recipe. Last spring I bought the ingredients for this fertilizer in bulk. They were all at my local agricultural supply store and, except for the kelp meal, everything was relatively cheap.

I mixed the proportions and used the fertilizer in my garden and I can tell you that I was very pleased with the results. I have enough COF left over to use in my garden again this year, and maybe even the following. Give Solomon’s methods and his COF a try and I think you’ll be pleased too.

A Home-Based Seed Company Recommendation
We bought most of our garden seeds this year from Wood Prairie Farm up in Bridgewater, Maine (population 612). The Gerritsen family has been farming organically there for over 30 years. They happen to live a short way down the road from my mother’s sister (Aunt Irene). I’ve written here before of this family farm in my essay titled: Aroostook’s Wood Prairie Farm.

What I happen to like about their seed selection is that it is limited. There are not so many mind-boggling choices. But the seeds being offered strike me as exceptionally fine varieties. Unfortunately, some seeds were sold out by the time I ordered.

Even if you have your garden seeds, or you decide to buy somewhere else, I suggest that you click on the link above and check out everything that Wood Prairie Farm offers, especially if you have aspirations of having your own successful farm or homestead business. Wood Prairie appears to be another exemplary farm, which is to say, a fine example of a small family farm that is surviving and thriving when so many small farms in the countryside are not.

Edison’s advice comes to mind—This hard working farm family is doing an exceptional job of marketing their diversified line of wholesome products, and they are doing it from all the way up in Northern Maine. One thing I was surprised to see is that Wood Prairie sells root crops by mail through the winter months.

Potato Pickin’ POWs

My mother grew up the daughter of a Potato farmer in Aroostook County Maine. As a girl, she picked potatoes. Just about every kid up there picked potatoes during harvest time. They would pick the potatoes off the ground into baskets and then carry the baskets to the end of the row and dump into a wooden barrel. They would be paid by the barrel. The public school would be shut down for a couple weeks so kids could help get the harvest in. It was long, hard, cold work, but it was work done in community and it is a part of that culture that is now virtually gone. Too bad.

With that in mind, my mother once told me that she remembered German prisoners of war helping to pick potatoes. I recently found the above picture that shows two such POWs in 1945. My mom would have been 10 years old when that picture was taken.

The picture came from the web site at Maine Memory Network. By the way, I’ve heard it said that Maine is a small town spread out over a large state. I like that.

The following YouTube video does an exceptional job of telling the story of raising potatoes in Aroostook county, and it also shows the Wood Prairie operation:


—Mayflower—
Further Insights Into The Pilgrim Story

In my teen years I spent a good portion of two summer vacations at a rustic little camp (no electricity or running water) on a small pond not far from Plymouth, Massachusetts. During that time I became better acquainted with the story of the Mayflower Pilgrims who landed and settled in Plymouth in the winter of 1620.

As a result, I developed a special regard for these brave and devoted Christian separatists. Later on I attended a series of lectures by Peter Marshall, co-author of The Light and the Glory: 1492-1793 (God's Plan for America). Then I found out from my Grandmother Kimball, keeper of the family history, that I am a Mayflower descendent.

Many Americans claim such lineage and it is not an outlandish thing because it has been calculated that more than 35 million Americans are, indeed, Mayflower descendants. It should be noted that not all the passengers on the Mayflower were Pilgrims, so it is possible to be a Mayflower descendant and not a Pilgrim descendant. Whatever the case, there is a good chance that your kin and mine shared in the adventure and tragedy of that amazing time in America’s history.

And so it was with great anticipation and interest that I read the book, Mayflower: A Story of Courage, Community, and War, by Nathaniel Philbrick this last month. The book drew me, not only for its subject matter, but for its author. My mother was a Philbrick of New England ancestry.

“Mayflower” turned out to be an exceptionally fine historical narrative. In fact, I found it riveting. If you have an interest in Pilgrim history, you must read this book. You’ll learn many things you did not know about the Pilgrim story. But I must warn you—some of it will disappoint.

The historical account begins with who the Pilgrims were and why they fled to America. Philbrick aptly presents the incredible hardship and providential events (though he does not attribute them to Providence) that the dedicated Believers encountered on their way to Plymouth, and in the beginning years of the colony. Then the book goes into the story of the Pilgrim/indian relations and culminates with a fascinating chronicle of King Philip’s War, which, hitherto, I knew almost nothing about.

You may already know that the original Pilgrim settlers made a peace treaty with the indian sachem, Massasoit, of the Pokanoket tribe (later known as the Wampanog), and that this peace treaty lasted for more than 50 years. But you may not realize that the Pokanokets were only one tribe among many in the Cape Cod area, and Pilgrim relations with these other tribes was not always rosy.

In one particularly fascinating part of the book the story is told of the Pilgrims, led by their military leader, Miles Standish, making a preemptive military move against an unfriendly tribe to the north. They had heard that this tribe intended to attack another English (not Pilgrim) settlement, then sweep down to Plymouth.

Standish and his small band of Pilgrims lured two indian warrior leaders (with the invitation of a meal) into a building in the English settlement. Once the indians sat down to the meal, Standish grabbed a knife that was around the neck of one warrior (the leader) and proceeded to stab him. While Standish and the indian fought it out, the other Pilgrim men fell on the other indian. Both indians were killed.

The story goes that the indian Standish killed had boasted to him the day before that he would one day kill Standish with the knife around his neck. The indian had taken it from a French sailor who he had killed. Though the indian was much bigger than Standish (a noticeably short man) Standish was a stocky bulldog of a man who wasn’t afraid of a fight.

The Pilgrims brought the severed heads of the two indians back to Plymouth and mounted them on poles for all other indians to see. This image doesn’t seem to fit with the usual image of the Pilgrims, and the event was a matter of great concern to their spiritual leader, Pastor John Robinson.

As for King Philip’s War (which occurred many years after the preceding incident), it turns out that King Philip was an indian sachem, the son of Massasoit. He led an indian uprising against the sons and grandsons of the original Pilgrim settlers in June of 1675. For the next 14 months all of southern New England was involved in the brutal, bloody war (with lots of head severing).

Philbrick says it was one of the most horrendous wars ever fought in North America, and that comes across pretty clear in the book. Large numbers of English settlers (8% of the population) and indians died. Captured indians were kept as “servants” or sold as slaves and shipped off to sugar plantations.

Out of the drama of the conflict emerged a remarkable historical figure named Benjamin Church, who is described by Philbrick as “part Pilgrim, part mariner, part indian, and altogether his own.” Single-handedly, Church made allies with various indians (an option the Pilgrim and Puritan forces refused to consider—until Church proved it could work), and led them in an unconventional but successful campaign against King Philip.

Mayflower is certainly not a mythologizing eulogy to the Pilgrim era of American history. It is a gritty and human account of gritty and enigmatically human people struggling with circumstances like you and I will never know. It’s worth noting that the historical account is one man’s historical interpretation of events that took place some 350 years ago. So some of the story, like all such stories, is undoubtedly inaccurate and incomplete. Nevertheless, it is clear that the book was very well researched and, though Philbrick is a secular author, his account is probably as honest and fair-minded as you’ll find. I recommend this book to you.

We Discover Road To Avonlea

My thanks to D.A. reader Carmen in North Carolina who wrote to tell me about the television series, Road to Avonlea, which ran from 1990 to 1996. I started to disengage from the culture of television in the early 1980s and had never heard of Road to Avonlea. On Carmen’s recommendation, we ordered a Netflix DVD of some of the first shows.

Marlene and I have now watched several episodes. We are enjoying them very much on these cold winter evenings, and look forward to seeing them all.

The show focuses on a rural community in turn-of-the-century Prince Edward Island (not too far from Aroostook County Maine). The scenery is beautiful and that is as endearing as some of the characters, particularly the adult actors like Olivia King, Gus Pike and Rachel Linde, who are my favorites.

This is probably old news to most of you reading this, but if some of you, like me, have never seen Road to Avonlea, I recommend it to you. If you like Little House on the Prairie and The Waltons, you will like Road to Avalon—though it is quite different from those programs.
I see the series is also available at Amazon



—Food For Thought—
About Contentious Religious Disputers

I’m not usually a contentious person, and I rarely (if ever) feel compelled to “set people straight” in their religious thinking. But it has been my observation that many other people are inclined to do this sort of thing, and in the most strident manner, and it never sets well with me. With that in mind, I was reading an article by Keith A. Mathson in the latest issue of Tabletalk magazine and came upon the following quotes from a letter written by John Newton, author of the hymn, “Amazing Grace.”

This particular letter was written by Newton “to a fellow minister who was preparing to write an article criticizing another minister for his lack of orthodoxy.” Here are two quotes from Newton:

“There is a principle of self, which disposes us to despise those who differ from us; and we think often under its influence, when we think we are only showing a becoming zeal in the cause of God.”
“Self-righteousness can feed upon doctrines as well as upon works; and a man may have the heart of a Pharisee, while his head is stored with orthodox notions of the unworthiness of the creature and the riches of free grace.”

Mathson writes: “Regarding our own hearts, Newton observes that we must contend for the faith, but he also observes that very few writers of controversy have not been hurt by it.” He quotes from Newton’s letter again (and this is the main point I want to present to you):

“Either they grow in a sense of their own importance, or imbibe an angry, contentious spirit, or they insensibly withdraw their attention from those things which are the food and the immediate support of the life of faith, and spend their time and strength upon matters which are at most but of a secondary value. This shows that if the service is honorable, it is dangerous. What will it profit a man if he gains his cause and silences his adversary, if at the same time he loses that humble, tender frame of spirit in which the Lord delights, and to which the promise of his presence is made?”
.....My Eric Sloane Print.....

Among artists, I’m fond of Eric Sloane, who also wrote many books. I’ve written of Sloane here before in my essay titled: The Christian Agrarian "Awareness" of Eric Sloane. and Diary of an Early American Boy.

Back in late 2008, with the economy at large crashing all around, I went to Ebay and looked (as I often do) for Eric Sloane prints. I knew from previous searches that signed prints by Eric Slaone typically sold for several hundred dollars. As a result, I never bought one. Spending that much money for an art print is not something I’ve ever done and not something I’m likely to ever do. So I window shop.

But, lo and behold, there was a signed Sloane print and the bid was less than $100. It was an artist’s proof of a painting I had seen before and always liked. The print was part of an estate and had never been framed (it has a price of $250 penciled on a back corner). I placed a bid, assuming that I would be outbid, but , amazingly, I wasn’t. All I can think is that all the other Sloane aficionados out there were preoccupied with the economy and hesitant to part with the money.

So I now have this “rare” Eric Sloane signed print and part of me says, “sell it.” But, on the other hand, another part of me says, “enjoy it.” I think I’ll probably enjoy it. I just need to make a frame for it and get a mat cut, and one of these days I’ll get to it. I’ll show you the whole thing then.


I have related this story to you as a lead-in to another idea that I’ve had in my mind for some time, and I finally got around to doing it this month....

How To Make Your Own Eric Sloane Forgery


I have been meaning to draw an Eric Sloane forgery for years. I reasoned that I would never be able to afford an actual Eric Sloane drawing, so I would just make my own. Sloane was adept at painting, but he was a master with a simple black pen on white paper. It so happens that pen and ink drawings are very easy to copy.

I have an old paperback copy of Eric Slaone’s book, “Our Vanishing Landscape.” The first page has a pen and ink illustration that I really like and I decided that would be a fine illustration for my first forgery. The final result, pictured above, took me an hour to “draw.” I bought an inexpensive mat and frame and had the genuine pen and ink drawing on my wall in no time. And I’m well pleased with it.

Which brings to mind my comments about real satisfaction that I penned earlier in this essay. Nice as that “rare” signed print I bought is, the simple handcrafted Eric Sloane forgery I made myself is far more satisfying to me.

If you could see this original work of art up close I think you would be impressed. Now I’ll tell you how to make your own forgery. It’s really easy.

The illustration in the book was fairly small. I wanted my version to be bigger, as I’m sure Slaone’s original was. So I took the book to a copy store and enlarged the drawing on a photocopy machine. Then I simply placed a clean sheet of white parchment paper over the photocopy and traced with a good pen. Here’s a picture that tells the story;



That is an inexpensive light box I’ve had for years and used when making drawings for the books that I’ve self published. The photocopy is below and the forgery is above. Like I said, it took me about an hour to trace the original and, though tedious, it was kind of fun following every squiggly track of the master’s pen.


—Truly Original Art—
Coming Someday Soon 
(maybe)
I think Eric Sloane started as an artist and branched out into writing books. I started out writing books and now want to branch out into art. Not to worry—I won’t be doing portraits (see last month’s letter). I’ll be doing something much more serious.... I’ve decided that I want to be a whimsical chicken artist.

Hens and roosters are wonderful subjects for a budding artist to capture, and that’s me—a budding artist. But as I’ve been considering this idea, I’ve decided that I will pursue my professional career as a chicken artist through the fictitious personage of my friend and neighbor (and, perhaps, something of an alter ego) “Jax” Hamlin.

Mr. Hamlin is an interesting older fellow and he has a local reputation hereabouts as a chicken artist. I’ll have a web site telling the unique story of Jax and how he came to draw chickens. I will broker limited edition originals for my friend through sales on Ebay and the web site.

If all of this sounds a bit zany, that’s because it is. But I’m serious about the chicken art, and am devoting my abilities to this esoteric pursuit almost every day. The way I look at it, if I’m not talented enough to learn to play a banjo, then I’ll be a chicken artist. Marlene is a little concerned about me but it’s okay. I was, after all, a forceps delivery. ;-)

If all goes as I hope, this idea will launch next winter. 




Stay tuned....

39 comments:

  1. Enjoyed the update and especially the Golden Girls. I'm an artist and I think you're doing quite well. As a fellow chicken lover I think the "girls" are awesome. ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Laryssa-
    Thank you. You are very kind. Jax Hamlin is very encouraged by your comment. :-)

    ReplyDelete
  3. I have a question in regards to your musicianship: have you considered the penny whistle? They are very cheap (you can get a nice one for ~$10), and also very easy to learn the basics on. I don't know if you are trying for a particular genre of music, but I thought I would throw the idea out there.

    I also like what you said about the bees. A big argument against evolution, etc. in my mind is irreducible complexity. The idea here is that even if you accepted that the universe is 6 billion years old or whatever, it is statistically impossible for the vast complexity of life (in all of its forms) to have gotten to the point we are at by itself. When I see life, I have to rejoice! It is too amazing to not believe in God!

    ReplyDelete
  4. WHAT ABOUT THE LAND!?!?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Bluesun-
    A penny whistle? Well, I'll see if I can find a penny whistle YouTube movie to see how it sounds. It's certainly more affordable than a banjo. I did consider the Jew harp for awhile. That's another affordable offbeat instrument. I will say that I have tried some of that hambone "music" and it leaves my thighs and face sore. It takes a little getting used to. I had this idea of a hambone duo—where two people make music by slapping each other. I haven't seen that done. But maybe I'll just stick to chicken art.

    ReplyDelete
  6. James-
    Thank you for asking. I forgot....

    LAND UPDATE
    The purchase agreement is still signed and we are still waiting to hear something from the seller or attorneys. Didn't hear a thing in January.

    APPLE CIDER VINEGAR UPDATE
    It's still in the jars on the shelf, making itself. The liquid looks much like it has looked for the past two or three months: brownish. I am hoping/expecting it will clarify one of these months and then we will draw it off and I'll show the end product.

    CLAMP UPDATE
    The carrots and beets are still buried in the clamp in the garden. I think I'll uncover it in February.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Herrick,
    I absolutely LOVE your updates! I learn SO much from you. Maine Man and I were just talking row covers with all intentions of giving it a go this year. He appreciated your tutorial. Love your drawing, great idea. I so want MM to build me some baskets, if not I may try. They will not be as pretty as yours. Lastly, HAPPY BIRHDAY!
    Thanks for all the good info!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Don't know what style of banjo playing you are trying to learn, but clawhammer is much easier than three finger and more appealing to my ear. If I ever get that far east again, I will stop by and give you a demo. I have tried three finger banjo, mandolin, guitar and fiddle. Sort of mastered the mando, less so the guitar, gave up on three finger banjo, and threw the fiddle through a window. But I can clawhammer fairly well.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Enjoyed your updates as always- I like your garden tote. I can also imagine it as a knitting or mending project tote. It’s nice to have something with a handle that you can bring from room to room, and I prefer something with sturdy sides (as opposed to a canvas bag) as it keeps materials more organized. I think I would enjoy one w/ wooden rather than mesh wire sides, and painted with the art of Jax Hamlin;)

    A thought about e-book distribution…I occasionally purchase knitting patterns from online yarn stores, and the default these days is to receive a pdf file. To create pdfs, you would need Adobe Acrobat software, which I believe you can purchase for around $100. Once you have the software installed, it is very simple. It will show up as a printer. So, you create the document in Word or whatever program you use, click Print, and select Adobe from your printer list, and a pdf file is created.

    You then email your customer the file. No shipping and handling fees! Most computers come with a free version of the Adobe reader, and if they don’t, it is available for free download.

    And Happy Birthday! Since growing/enjoying good food is such a theme on your blog- what did you request for your birthday dinner?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Mr. Kimball,

    I wait with bated breath for your monthly update. I've learned a lot from you (and along with you), but more than anything else, I appreciate your voice.

    All the best to you and your family.

    Jamie Cain
    Buford, Georgia

    ReplyDelete
  11. countrygirl-
    Thanks very much.

    tickmeister-
    My banjo efforts were limited to frailing. I'm a hopeless case. You are a genius. Thank you for the encouragement. :-)

    Kristin-
    One of my earlier garden totes utilized wood slats instead of the hardware cloth. I thought it a bit too bulky. You are right that the baskets are good for other things. I use one to transport mail-orders back & forth from my shop to house (where Marlene takes care of getting online postage).

    Thanks for the e-book insight. I believe my mac will make pdf files. That sounds simpler than I thought. No shipping & handling fees is very appealing. I may never conventionally publish another book again if I can get the e-book thing together.

    Marlene did ask me what I wanted for my birthday dinner and I told her that grilled cheese sandwiches and soup would be fine with me. We ended up going to Doug's Fish Fry today after church.

    But I will say that Marlene told me she was going to have a surprise for me for dinner last Friday morning as I headed off for work. It turned out to be baked beans made from scratch, cooked mostly on top of the woodstove all day in a cast iron frying pan.

    That was a first for Marlene. Baked beans from scratch was one of those homemade foods she has wanted to make for years but just never did it—sort of like making sauerkraut, which, once Marlene actually got around to making, turned out to be really easy and really good and she has made it several times since.

    Well, the baked beans turned out just fine, and I'm looking forward to having them again. The only thing we figured they lacked was some maple syrup for sweetening but we ran out of maple syrup a few weeks ago. That's a powerful incentive to make a few more gallons this spring.

    Thanks for asking.

    ReplyDelete
  12. you may need to brush up on bee genetics. In our hives, sometimes the queens and the workers are sisters.

    I think you'd learn this *real* fast if you tended bees instead of reading about them.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Mr. Kimball,
    I was excited to read that you named your son after Robert E. Lee. My middle name is Lee, one of three generations of the name. I love to read your monthly posts, and have a new item (the garden tote) to request from my wood-working husband for my birthday! I feel your pain on the banjo- I've started the fiddle this year, and it's going to be a long, slow process. It's also good to know that a Yankee appreciates a true Southern hero ;).
    Mitzi

    ReplyDelete
  14. Mr. Kimball,

    I agree with you that one has to have more faith to believe in evolution than in the Creator. If you like reading about apologetics as much as I do I would recommend the website ApolgeticsPress.org.

    I have been enjoying your posts for some time and look forward to each one.

    Robbie

    ReplyDelete
  15. Mr. Kimball
    I enjoyed your January post very much, especialy you row covers. I have used these in my raised bed gardens since last year. I also have covered smaller sections with clear poly, form extra early plantings. I used pieces of rebar, cut into lenghts and put in the ground, much the same as your wooden stakes. For holding the fabric or plastic on,I used an old hose that I split down the middle. I works pretty good, but maybe not as good as your clamps. Yhe only good thing is that you can puy as many on as you want because they were from a throway hose.As far as your banjo playing,the banjo is a very hard instrument to learn. Not only one hand to finger the strings, but the other has to learn how to fingerpick. I have played guitar for years, but could never master the banjo. Stay warm--Ed

    ReplyDelete
  16. Good to hear from you again! The row cover article looks very interesting, not sure if I'll be able to wait until tomorrow.

    Seth Godin wrote a good tutorial on ebook authorship, here. He writes fun stuff about marketing; most of his suggestions are things I see you doing better than he describes.

    On bees: you're right about honeybees dieing when alone, but there are many solitary varieties of bee, famously including bumble bees. It's worth building habitat for them, in the spirit of a birdhouse or bat box but much simpler: just drill horizontal holes of various sizes in a piece of wood, kept out of the rain. They pollinate different plants than honeybees, and don't really compete with them, so it might be a worthwhile step toward beekeeping.

    ReplyDelete
  17. "if there were favorable genetic mutations in the female worker bee, it is impossible for these to be passed on because the female workers do not lay eggs."

    The transfer of genetic materials doesn't depend on the female workers. As you stated, they do not reproduce, only the queen does. This doesn't go against what evolution says though.

    I also wanted to clear up a common misconception that you're representing about evolution. Survival of the fittest in evolutionary terms means genetic survival according to fitness, which is the survival of the organism to a reproductive age. To reiterate, it doesn't necessarily mean the strongest, but simply the ability to provide for reproduction.

    In this way you may see how a genetic change in the queen or the drone will persist over generations, or fail to in the case that the genetic change was 'unfavorable' (meaning the genes were lost because the organisms no longer reproduce).

    ReplyDelete
  18. Great update Mr. Kimball. As usual, very inspiring. We'll be trying a version of your whizbang row covers this spring! Also, based on TV viewing preferences (which seem to mirrow our family's) might I suggest videos from Franklin Springs Media. I thought immediatly of a documentary they did on Stonewall Jackson when I read about your interest in Robert E. Lee. You might enjoy it, and other movies from this group:

    http://www.franklinsprings.com/films/stillstanding/

    ReplyDelete
  19. Herrick,

    Thanks for posting the Whizbang Row Cover info. I've waited for it for some time. I do like the rebar idea that another commenter posted.

    As for pdf files, since you're using a Mac (good choice :-) ) you can make pdf files of anything you can print, the option is right there in the print dialog box.

    Keep the monthly articles coming.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Anonymous-
    I'm sure I do have a lot to learn about bee genetics. But if you read what I wrote more carefully, you'll see that I said the queen lays the worker eggs and the egg that will be the queen that replaces her. So, yes, the queen and workers can be sisters, and I knew that.

    Actually, the drones are usually brothers to the sisters. And they mate with their sisters. It's all very incestuous and that, in itself might be considered another strike against the possibility of bees evolving to some higher level of development.

    I don't have any bees right now but I do have a couple of sisters. One has children. The other doesn't. So, genetic traits of one sister have been passed on to her offspring. But my other sister has not passed on any genetic traits. How could she? She doesn't have any children.

    Now lets suppose my sister without children was born with a favorable genetic abnormality that allows her to easily jump over a Greyhound bus (and let's suppose that happens to be very valuable to our species). How, I ask, can the mutation in the childless sister be passed on to the offspring of the other sister?

    Something like that is not only statistically impossible, it's just-plain-downright impossible (no matter how many bazillion years of time we allow for it to happen).

    If you had sisters you would know this ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  21. Mitzi-
    It's nice of you to post. I'm a Yankee by birth but a Southerner at heart. This wasn't always the case. It came as I read the history of the South and came to fully understand the true nature of the North/South conflict—it truly was a War of Northern Aggression.

    Robbie-
    I'll check out the link. Thank you.

    fast eddie-
    It's good to hear from you. I think you may have warned me a year ago that the banjo was a tough instrument to learn.

    Joel-
    I'll check out the Seth Godin info. I think I read a "Guerilla Marketing" book that he authored many years ago.

    I've wanted to make blocks with holes in them (and a little roof) for the solitary bees (like orchard bees) but haven't got around to it yet. Your mention of it is a good prod to actually do it. Seems to me that there is a certain size hole that is best. Do you know what it is?

    dannyp-
    Thanks for clearing up my misconception and setting the record straight.

    I will freely admit that I am no authority on evolution, and I don't ever expect to be. It just doesn't interest me that much. But I'm aware that the theory is full of shortcomings and conundrums, and this bee "thing" seems like a very big unexplainable.

    I posted about the bees here with the expectation that some evolutionary "expert" would chime in to dazzle and belittle me with his superior understanding and insights into honeybee evolution. It may happen yet.

    In any event, I just can't see how it is possible for any significant change to occur over time with the honeybee roles and relationships that we see today in a typical colony.

    timfromohio-
    Good suggestion. I have the Stonewall Jackson dvd from Franklin Springs Media. It is well done and very insightful. As you probably know, they just came out with a movie about George Washington Carver, and I'm sure that is an equally good production.

    vdeal-
    Nothing wrong with rebar for hoops, except it is heavy and hard to bend in a smooth curve and it is rougher on the fabric. But use what you have on hand, or what you feel is best. I was going to use rebar for the hoop stakes, but I had lots of wood scraps and the tools to make them into stakes. I also figured that if I left a wood stake in the ground, and tilled over it the next year, it would just break and do not harm. But a piece of rebar would be more of a problem to the machine.

    Yes, it looks like my mac is "geared" for making an e-book. That's good news. I'm a firm believer in the value of a Mac.

    Thanks for the feedback.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Hi Mr. Kimball,

    We had this quote in our bulletin last Sunday from Oswald Chambers--it reminded me of you:

    "Faith is deliberate confidence in the character of God whose ways you may not understand at the time."

    Thank you for your Deliberate encouragement!

    Matthew

    ReplyDelete
  23. Jason BarkerFebruary 03, 2010

    Hi Herrick, I look forward to these posts and as usual this one was great.Regarding religious disputers in the words of Father Corapi "Less preaching,More praying"

    ReplyDelete
  24. Your link to the maine memory network should be http://www.mainememory.net/

    Your current link is not working

    ReplyDelete
  25. Jamie, Matthew, Jason & Anonymous-

    Sincere thanks for the comments.

    (and I have fixed that link)

    Herrick K.

    ReplyDelete
  26. The scientific theory of evolution holds up very well when applied to honey bees.

    Worker bees with favorable traits will be better able to support a hive. It is true that a worker bee with an individual mutation not inherited from the queen will not be able to pass on the favorable traits. In the short term that could be viewed as a problem. Fortunately, we are not dealing with the short term. Early bee ancestor fossils have been discovered dating back as far as the early Cretaceous, about 100 million years ago. A queen who produces workers with favorable traits will pass the traits on to future queens and their workers. Small changes passed on by queens for 100 million years can really add up.

    The scientific theory of evolution is supported by overwhelming evidence. I don't want to seem disrespectful as I am a long time reader of you blog and a regular user of a Whizbang Wheel Hoe, but you are a man of faith and no amount of evidence contrary to your position will ever be enough to convince you.

    Faith and science are sadly not compatible. The scientific world could use more people with zealous convictions, and the world of faith could use more facts and evidence.

    I'm not writing this to cause any problems. I hope it is accepted in the same spirit.

    ReplyDelete
  27. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Hilarious post Herrick . . . :)

    I'm an art teacher and a professional artist, and by my University art standard you are doing GREAT. In fact, you might want to consider uploading your work on Etsy to sell. It's a great site to get people all over the globe to see your work and purchase it. There is a small fee involved, but it is worth it. Here's a link to my site for you to see how I set my Esty shop up. Let me know if you have any questions about it (the site) or about art in general. (drawing, framing, and the like) I would LOVE to help you launch an art site!

    http://www.etsy.com/shop/gfout?ga_search_query=gfout&ga_search_type=seller_usernames

    garth

    ReplyDelete
  29. Hi Herrick,
    Thanks for mentioning the Bartlett Boys. I'm rather proud of them, and agree with Thomas Edison's comment regarding hard work accomplishing much. Winter is when the guys have more time to practice their skils, and are having more opportunities now to share their music.

    Your banjo has gone by the same wayside as the mountain dulcimer my father-in-law crafted for me. Maybe some day I'll make it a priority.

    We also appreciated the row cover tutorial. That is something we need to make better use of in this land with a very short growing season.

    Your monthly posts are great!

    ReplyDelete
  30. Farmer GeorgeFebruary 11, 2010

    Dear Anonymous,

    The Biblical account of special Creation by a sovereign God is supported by overwhelming evidence. I don't want to seem disrespectful, but you are a man of faith and no amount of evidence contrary to your position will ever be enough to convince you.

    Faith and science are very compatible. However, the faith world could use more people with zealous convictions, and the world of science could use more facts and evidence.

    We understand so little about the universe. We are all looking at the same evidence and yet reach entirely different conclusions.

    There are two sides to the creation/evolution debate with incompatible worldviews. Your worldview determines which side you land on. Is your faith in man who is fallible or in God who is infallible? I don't have enough faith to believe in man who wasn't there when it all began. I choose to believe the account of the One who was there when it all began. And it helps that the evidence points to a common Creator, not a common ancestor.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Farmer GeorgeFebruary 11, 2010

    Herrick,

    You can obtain free software that will publish pdf files, such as Open Office. I'm not sure about the Mac, but I know Open Office is available for free download for Windows users. You can save and document as pdf file. This option also exists in Microsoft Word. Since most of us use a word processor software program to write, it is easy to save as pdf and you're done.

    Love the basket design. I see some in our future gardening.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Herrick,

    I use a mac. It is very simple to convert something into a .pdf file. If you are using Pages, when you have your final product that you want to convert, first save it. Then go to file and click on export. Choose .pdf, quality Best. You're done. No software to buy. It's free.

    You can also convert the things you have made in pages into word documents, too.

    Thanks for your blog. I just bought your Garden Cart book and look forward to making one.

    God bless your family in Christ,

    Adam in TX

    ReplyDelete
  33. Matthew-
    I like the Oswald Chambers quote. Thanks for posting it.

    Anonymous-
    It is accepted in the same spirit. Have it your way.

    Garth-
    Many thanks for the encouragement and inspiration. I'm really impressed with your Etsy site and your art. Marlene has been to Etsy almost every day since your comment here and she has set up an account with the intention of selling her soap there someday soon. I think it will be an excellent place for Jax Hamlin to market his chicken art.

    Hi Lynn-
    It's nice to get your comment here. I think you have a truly remarkable family and very much enjoy reading your blog updates.

    Farmer George-
    Thanks for the comments. Few people understand that every human has a foundational worldview that consists of very fundamental faith-based presuppositions. I think you are one who does understand this. Evolution is but one example where these unreconcileable worldviews collide. I think I'll blog about this subject someday soon.

    Adam-
    Thanks for the PDF advice. I have figured out that I can, as you say, make pdf files on my Mac with no problem. But now I am wondering how to keep the size of the pdf file down while including lots of how-to pictures. They say that an e-book should be no more than 2 or 3 MB in size so people with dial-up modems can download. But just a few pictures really kicks the size way up there.

    So I'm making progress with the e-book "thing" but I still have a lot to learn.

    I have seen that there are software programs that help create and minimize the size of an e-book, but they are all Windows based... except Adobe Acrobat for the Mac. That might do what I am looking for, but it is expensive.

    In the meantime, I've come up with a possible alternative idea for selling an electronic "book" using what I already know and am familiar with...Blogger.com. I'll explain it in my next post. Thanks again.

    ReplyDelete
  34. have you thought of selling your chicken art and e-books via Etsy.com? p.s. I enjoy your blog...for so many reasons...THANKS!

    ReplyDelete
  35. Herrick,

    I guess I wasn't clear in my post. I wasn't suggesting using rebar as the hoops but as the stakes. However, your point on tilling up stakes makes me reconsider.

    ReplyDelete
  36. As always another nourishing post. Thank you for your service to humanity, that is how I view your blog. You and I would get along quite well I suspect no matter how much we agreed or disagreed about most things. I used a quote from the January 2010 addition to the blog in last Sunday's sermon. I quoted some of your comments about 'Satisfaction' under the Investment Advice section. This week I may be using the Robert E Lee quote as we are currently exploring where we are as a shrinking rural church and God's vision for the church at large and seek his vision for our community of faith. Btw Robert E Lee is a kinsman as I'm a direct descendent of one of his siblings making Robert E's father Harry 'Light Horse' Lee my great grandfather (to the 7th or so power).

    Also catching my eye in this installment is the Pilgram book by Nathaniel Philbrick. I read his book In the Heart of the Sea, it was very raw and riveting.

    Thanks again,
    Phillip

    ReplyDelete
  37. Sorry I didn't get back to you sooner. Here's a test of different sizes from Los Angeles; different bees may be common where you live:

    Solitary bee house

    I couldn't disagree with anonymous more, over the quote "you are a man of faith and no amount of evidence contrary to your position will ever be enough to convince you. Faith and science are sadly not compatible."

    I have complete faith that all of creation is the work of God, and also am convinced by the evidence for evolution. Anonymous seems confused partly by a recent quirk that the English language has developed: science is great at asking "why," but faith is the only way to answer questions of "wherefore." Hardly anyone asks "wherefore" anymore, because they think it means the same thing as "why" (or if they're really confused, the same thing as "where").

    I think the requirement to reject science is a part of certain types of religious practice, but as I see it, that custom serves the same purpose as requiring a certain haircut. It definitely wasn't part of how I was raised.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Anonymous from February 06, 2010 here, arguments of faith aside, nobody has anything to say concerning my comments on The Honeybee-Evolution Conundrum?

    ReplyDelete
  39. >nobody has anything to say concerning my comments on The Honeybee-Evolution Conundrum?

    Hm...I agree with the facts you present, and would also like to add that a very similar arrangement seems to have evolved among naked mole rats.

    I don't agree with your opinion on the nature of faith, though. I think I also disagree with Mr. Kimball on the same topic: science is about not putting faith in man, but scrutinizing and verifying claims; that said, any worldview larger than solipsism requires some sort of faith.

    I think you both have bought into the notion of contradiction being equivalent to falsehood. This is true in mathematics, but within mathematics self-consistency requires incompleteness (as Godel showed). So general relativity and quantum mechanics are irreconcilable; the book of Genesis says that mankind was created on the sixth day in chapter 1 verse 27, and on the first day in chapter 2 verse 4. Neither physics nor theology is a mathematical theorem, and contradiction does not disprove them.

    ReplyDelete